Last updated: August 17, 2026
Trade secrets are defined at both the state and federal levels. Thirty-eight states have adopted the Uniform Trade Secret Act ("UTSA") which defines a trade secret in two parts. First, information must derive "independent economic value" from not being discoverable by others. Second, the owner of the trade secret must use reasonable efforts to keep the information secret. Depending on your location and interstate sales, other states can have quirky laws that you should be aware of.
Similarly, the Restatement of Torts defines a trade secret as "[a]ny formula, pattern, device or compilation of information which is used in one's business, and which gives him an opportunity to obtain an advantage over competitors who do not know or use it. It may be a formula for a chemical compound, a process of manufacturing, treating or preserving material, a pattern for a machine or other device, or a list of customers."
On the federal level, the Economic Espionage Act of 1996, which primarily related to espionage and interstate or foreign theft of trade secrets, was amended by the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) in 2016. This included a revision of the prior act’s definition for trade secrets, aligning it with that of the UTSA’s and effectively adding the ability to pursue trade secrets on a federal level. These laws do not conflict with each other, but can instead be used to pursue claims on the federal and state levels simultaneously if one so chose to do so.
COPYRIGHT ©
, TORREY PINES LAW GROUP, PC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. | LEGAL NOTICES | SITE MAP
Torrey Pines Law Group, PC serves technology innovators with protecting intellectual property, obtaining regulatory approvals and clearances, and making deals and closing technology transactions throughout the U.S., including in major technology hubs such as San Diego, San Francisco, Palo Alto, San Jose, Silicon Valley, Boston, Cambridge, Chicago, Minneapolis, Houston, Dallas, Atlanta, Denver, Seattle, Portland, Boulder, Orlando, the Research Triangle (Raleigh, Durham, and Chapel Hill), the Mid-Atlantic (New Jersey, New York, Philadelphia, Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, DC), Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Ann Arbor, and throughout Southern California in Los Angeles, Orange County, Irvine, Torrey Pines, Sorrento Valley, and La Jolla.
We have experience with international intellectual property, regulatory and transactional matters pending in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, and Guangzhou China; Tokyo, Japan; Berlin, Munich and Frankfurt Germany; Tel Aviv Israel; Mumbai, Bengaluru, and New Delhi India; London and Edinburgh United Kingdom; Vancouver, Toronto, Calgary and Montreal Canada; Dublin, Ireland; Cape Town, South Africa; Mexico City and Tijuana Mexico; Brussels, Belgium; Copenhagen, Denmark; Paris, France; Madrid and Barcelona Spain; Moscow, Russia; Santiago, Chile; Montevideo, Uruguay; Buenos Aires, Argentina; Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro Brazil; Seoul, South Korea; Taipei, Taiwan; Hong Kong; Hanoi, Vietnam; Bangkok, Thailand; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Milan, Italy; Singapore; Sydney, Melbourne, Perth and Adelaide Australia; Auckland, New Zealand; Oslo, Norway; Stockholm, Sweden; Helsinki, Finland; Kiev, Ukraine; Budapest, Hungary; Vienna, Austria; Prague, Czechia; Geneva and Lausanne Switzerland; Bahrain; Doha, Qatar; Abu Dhabi and Dubai UAE; and Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.